|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Above: Standard CCD theory holds that a resolution of about 1-2 arcseconds/pixel is ideal. Above is an image taken with a resolution of 3.6 arcseconds/pixel. Pixel size is really no big deal for most imaging. Image by Gary Breneman.
Number of Pixels Again, more is better...usually. The only potential drawback to a greater number of pixels is a slower download time from the camera and longer processing times while manipulating the image later. Most CCD cameras are now coming with high-speed USB 2.0 connections, and computers are becoming extremely fast, so these disadvantages are becoming less and less important. The advantages to more pixels include larger images on a computer monitor, the ability to make larger prints, and the images tend to be more aesthetically pleasing, even when reduced significantly to be viewed on the web.
One-Shot Color vs. Tri-Color Imaging A major advance in CCD technology in recent years has been the advent of one-shot color cameras. Many CCD chips are inherently black and white. These CCDs require colored filters (red, green, and blue), and a minimum of 3 exposures (one through each color filter) to capture a color image. Many new CCDs incorporate one-shot color chips. These chips divide the chip into separate red, green, and blue sensitive pixels. There is no need for individual color filters, so a single exposure can capture a color image. While these chips are sometimes less sensitive than their non-color counterparts, they require only a single exposure instead of three, so the total exposure times tend to be similar or even less. Also, newer one-shot color cameras tend to be much more sensitive than their predecessors. Black and white CCDs tend to have more versatility than one-shot color cameras. They are better suited to narrowband imaging and scientific applications such as asteroid searches or photometric studies. However, for taking pretty pictures, one-shot color cameras work very well and offer a very easy learning curve for beginners.
The Reality of the Situation In an ideal world, every CCD imager would have the biggest, most sensitive CCD camera available; just like every amateur astronomer would have the biggest telescope! But like telescopes, price is always a factor, and almost any quality CCD camera will work fine with any capable telescope. Technique is a big part of it, and great images have been taken with small telescopes and relatively inexpensive CCD cameras from suburban backyards, many of which are even better than some images taken with high-end, sophisticated telescopes, monster CCDs, and permanent observatories at dark sites.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright ©2000-2008 Starizona |